confessions of a worried teacher

critical inquiries into westernised higher education

Month: December, 2013

The most popular posts on my blog in 2013

I really like this blog. Great ideas and discussion. Challenges. All you want from an academic blog really.

Would tenured faculty be hired today? A proposed experiment

A good post by by Lsb and Field. Are we actually talking about Academic Capitalism?

The Lab and Field

There’s been much discussion of late concerning Peter Higgs’ assertion that, were he a newly-minted PhD today, he likely wouldn’t have been hired.  Yes, that Peter Higgs.  You know, the Nobel laureate for whom the Higgs boson is named?  Since 1964, he’s published fewer than 10 papers.

Fast-forward just a few weeks, when Rebecca Schuman posted that a search for a tenure-track job in pre-1900 English literature was going to interview candidates on 5 days’ notice at the Modern Language Association conference in Chicago.  She pointed out that not only was this logistically and financially impossible for many who are on the job market (postdocs and early-career researchers generally don’t have much disposable income to purchase last-minute flights and hotels), but that it signalled the devastating way in which the academic hiring system is broken.

To be clear, I don’t think this particular problem is found that frequently in the…

View original post 444 more words

The Toxic Academe and the Broken Academic – INTRODUCTION #1

Hi – so this is my first, tentative venture into sharing my academic work more widely, of engaging in what Mark Carrigan has called continuous publishing.  I am also mindful of the warnings offered by Pat Thompson about the potential for our work to be misappropriated.  But, I want to try and reach a wider community of critical friends who can comment, discuss, suggest, argue against, signpost, etc.

What am I expecting from you, the reader?  I am unsure really.  I think careful responses!

The first entry is a draft introduction to a paper I am currently working on.  I am aiming to submit this to an international journal dealing with qualitative methodologies and is sympathetic to the use of autoethnographic approaches to research and writing.

So, WHAT DO YOU THINK?

 

The Toxic Academe and the Broken Academic

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The ‘crisis’ came after a busy doctoral study school.  In a way it was planned.  That might sound strange but I was already aware enough that something was seriously wrong with me, that ‘things’ – relationships, work, thoughts, could not go on as they were, that something had to change.  I had already gone through that step, discussed by Karp in his excellent book ‘Speaking of Sadness’, of redefining myself as ‘depressed’.  This new, powerful way of defining myself was to be the break with the past, the beginning of a new, frightening, me.  It was unstoppable.  Volition no longer appeared viable as an idea of how I was in the world.  My last, so it felt, act of volition to delay the moment of singularity where one life transformed irrevocably into another could be labeled as ‘admin’, that bugbear of academic life.  So, I woke on that fateful Monday morning, tired but not feeling too bad.  I drank my coffee in a relaxed state looking forward to an afternoon of relaxation.  But first, and isn’t there always a ‘but first…’?  But first I wanted (needed?) to go into the office to deal with course administration following the study school.  A few emails, a discussion with the course administrator, and then I could chill. The afternoon and evening would, however, escape any pretence at volition, of agency as a reflexive action in the world.

This article is intensely personal, my story, but in being thus it is also intensely objective since personal stories are always in context, and so always also social (Ellis, 1991).  It is a story of modern academic life and how it is molded by internal and external dynamics.  In particular it is a story of the relationship between exogenous and endogenous conditions that created a personal ‘crisis’.  In this narrative I am not blaming anybody, though there were managerial actions that precipitated my decline into radical self- doubt.  I hope to convey that a range of external conditions, that is external to my inner world, to consciousness, interacted with habitual ways of being in the world, of responding to certain scenarios, of deeply structured ways of being, what Bourdieu called ‘habitus’.  In this narrative I wish to say something about this interaction and therefore contribute more widely to debates about agency and the limits of agency.  Specifically though, I want to explore the intensification of academic labour, of how this occurs in the context of discourses of ‘excellence’, the ‘global university’, ‘new public management’, and expansion of higher education.  I want to narrate a phenomenology of academic life that captures the lived, embodied experience of how these discourses play out institutionally and personally.  In doing so I will meander through a series of related topics.

This is an unashamedly ‘first person’ account.  How could it be anything but?  I will, as an academic, justify this claim.  In preparing for this endeavor I have read numerous papers on autoethnography.  I have felt myself touched and warned by the cautionary tales and experiences of others such as Carol Rambo Ronai (1998), Barbara Jago (2002), Brett Smith (1999), Sarah Wall (2008), and Nicholas Holt (2008); of how they struggled for legitimacy of their autoethnographic tales that did not ‘fit’ many accepted academic norms; of the dangers to your credibility amongst peers by either adopting such first-person methodologies or of outing oneself as suffering mental illness. Yet, autoethnography seems perfectly placed to conduct the kind of sociological analysis that follows, of relating the personal self to the academic self (Bochner, 1997, p. 432), particularly when faced with an academe that splits the personal from the academic.  The autoethnographic enterprise is not about self-indulgence.  If anything it is the opposite.  Arthur Frank (2000) argues for the standpoint of the storyteller, that story infers relationship with a listener, that storytelling invites other stories, other listenings, not just analysis from nowhere.  This is the opposite of speaking from nowhere.  It privileges a location (in theory, in methodology).  It is an ethical stance.  But, an ethical stance towards what?  I could craft some memorable and clever phrases but I would rather point you towards the wonderful words of Ronald Pelias (2004, p. 10) when he says,

They were teaching students who seemed more interested in grades than learning.  They were working for administrators who seemed more concerned with the bottom line than quality education.  They were going to endless meetings that didn’t seem to matter, writing meaningless reports that seemed to disappear in the bureaucracy, and learning that service seemed to have little effect on others’ lives.  Productivity was the motto of the day, so they published article after article that no one seemed to read, particularly those who were the focus of the study.  They wrote piece after piece on social issues, but none seemed to make any difference.  They researched topics that got them promotions and tenure but seemed removed from whom they were.  They felt empty, despondent, disillusioned.

 

The ‘they’ he refers to are ‘us’, ‘me’, ‘you’.  He is referring to a certain crisis of faith in the purpose of higher education that many feel.  He is referring to that splitting off of the personal from the academic self that Bochner notes above and specifically the way the academe appears to want us to subjugate the former for the latter; what Parker Palmer describes as the ‘divided self’ (Palmer, 2010).  The study of higher education is filled with debates of questionable faith in the modern academe.  This maybe in terms of the academe as Academic Capitalism (Slaughter & Rhoades, 2010) or the rise of the Global University (Marginson, 2004; 2006).  I enjoy and love these academic texts.  I refer to them not just because they have taken on the mantle of ‘classics’, but, because they speak powerful truths.  I suspect, though, that this very power does not rely on the relaying of ‘facts’, of the scientific quality of the research, but because when we read them we feel what they speak of.   Part of what we feel when really engaging with such texts is a sense that the higher education world we are part of could be different.  This may be phrased in nostalgic terms that imply a certain loss of purpose, as if the origins of the university in the establishment and sustenance of social elites did not exist.  I do not want to join such nostalgia.  Rather, the sense of loss may express the desire that attracted many of us to the academe.  This could be a love of knowledge, a desire for deeper understanding, and possibly most important a belief that the work we do could make a difference.  As is often the case, at this point I come back to my intellectual touchstone, Edward Said, and his discourse on the role of the intellectual (Said, 2005; 2012).  If the role of the academic is not to speak truth to power, then what is our social function?  That is the question that animates me here and calls upon me to find a style of inquiry that speaks a truth to power through storytelling, by staking a certain ethical standpoint.

This standpoint is grounded in experience.  In my reading I was struck by the pained honesty of many writers in the tradition of autoethnography.  I was struck by the role that vulnerability plays in their texts, and the wider significance of telling ‘their’ stories as a way of telling ‘our’ stories.  This is an echo here of C. Wright Mills’ Sociological Imagination, of the translation of “private troubles into public issues”, of David Karp’s observation (1995) that his depression was indeed his but when so many American’s appeared to suffer depression it was definitely a public issue.  In linking his personal and academic selves Karp sought to give a sociological account of his depression in discussion with others.  His was an ethical standpoint; a recognition that the voice of those suffering depression was like an absent presence in the academic literature.  So, he felt compelled to speak from the position of one who suffered depression, and to speak with others who lived with it (11).  There is, then, a degree of ‘remoralisation’ in the telling of such stories.  It is a necessary process as depression and illness generally can be so demoralizing (Frank, 2000).  And many autoethnographists write of the therapeutic need to convey their stories.  But I feel emboldened by Frank’s further discussion of illness stories as acts of ‘care of the self’, a resistance to the power of expert knowledge to define us, resistance to being lost in institutional processes of managing the ill person.  Illness stories, my story here, can be seen as ‘technologies of the self’, as practices that privilege the knowledge of those defined as ill in such ways that challenge the hegemony of medical or institutional knowledge’s.  I see this resonate in Barbara Jago’s (2002) account of ‘academic depression’ where she states that “I write because my story is, in many respects, the story of the academy”.  To tell her story is to tell ‘our’ story; to open up the academe to critical scrutiny, but to do so from somewhere (the ethical stance) rather than nowhere.  C. Wright Mill’s articulation of the translation of private troubles into public issues implies a relational world.  The authenticity of my story lies in the extent to which it brings me out of an inauthentic ‘being with’ (self, others) that is dominated by ‘self-concern’ and renders others as mere objects, and makes possible a more authentic ‘concern for others’ (Batchelor, 1983).  Illness, depression, can face us with the existential reality of being alone and vulnerable in the world.  On the worst of days ‘sufferers become swamped by their selves and lost in them’ (Karp, 1995, p. 105).  On those days my sense of self was one where an ‘injured, hurting, pained self dominates thought, perception, and action’ (105).  Our existential reality, though, is also one of a horizon of possibilities.  The current illness is not the only option.  And, critically, it is a world of ‘being with others’.  It is this ‘being with others’, and the cultivation of a concern for others that brings us closer to an authentic existence.

So, telling this story is an act of ‘remoralisation’ at the personal and social levels.

 

Writing the my story/our story account (layered accounts)

Much of what constitutes my academic identity, and identity is a central feature of this story, is bound up with an interest in policy and policy effects.  Inevitably then I will touch upon policy in terms of text and discourse (Ball, 1994) as part of the exogenous conditions of my crisis.  I want to engage in a dialogue with what others have written about the nature of modern academic life, to see the continuities and disruptions with my own story.  The question is how to do this while maintaining a connection between my personal and academic self, how to write the my/our story without privileging the abstract minds eye (parker?p. xxiii) and subjugating the heartfelt concern that drives me here.

I am certainly not the first to encounter this question.  So, again my inspiration comes from those before me who have endeavoured to speak in a heartfelt manner about the private trouble whilst also attending to the sociological truth of the public issue.  And so it is from my reading how other autoethnographers have crafted their texts that I seek to write a layered account, where layered means ‘…a back-and-forth movement between experiencing and examining a vulnerable self and observing and revealing the broader context of that experience’ (Ellis, 2007, p. 14).  This approach can work to decentre academic authority (1998, p. 407), of combining ‘a novelistic and scholarly voice’ (behar 114).  So, this my/our story utilizes a moving between literary non-fictional accounts (emotional introspection) and more obvious ‘academic’ reflection (see Jago, 2002).  This will take on the character of a dialogue or set of discussions between my ‘being there’ (the work of recreating felt states) and ‘being here’ (academic reflections on the autoethnographic work) (Spry, 2001).  Consequently I speak to debates on the intensification of academic labour and the performative culture that is overdetermined by changing political economy of higher education.  But I do so from a bodily standpoint, of an understanding that my body is inscribed by ‘traces of culture’ (Spry, 2001, p. 711).

Good autoethnography, as Tami Spry has argued,  “is a provocative weave of story and theory” (713).  The narrative must be persuasive both affectively and critically.  Revelation is not enough in itself if it does not move the reader to a new place of understanding.  In doing this I hope to convince you, the reader, that this story of a damaged academic has wider validity.  This is not validity in the positivist sense, but rather of verisimiltude, of how it resonates with your phenomenological understandings (Ellis, 1999, p. 672).  In this my/our story I ask the reader to feel the truths contained, to share social truths by engaging with personal stories, engage with public issues through feeling private matters.

References

Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach.

Batchelor, S. (1983). Alone with others: An existential approach to Buddhism.

Bochner, A. P. (1997). It’s About Time: Narrative and the Divided Self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418–438. doi:10.1177/107780049700300404

Ellis, C. (1991). Sociological Introspection and Emotional Experience. Symbolic Interaction, 14(1), 23–50. doi:10.1525/si.1991.14.1.23

Ellis, C. (1999). Heartful Autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 669–683. doi:10.1177/104973299129122153

Ellis, C. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research With Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/1077800406294947

Frank, A. W. (2000). The Standpoint of Storyteller. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 354–365. doi:10.1177/104973200129118499

Holt, N. L. (2008). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

Jago, B. J. (2002). Chronicling an Academic Depression. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31(6), 729–757. doi:10.1177/089124102237823

Karp, D. A. (1995). Speaking of Sadness : Depression, Disconnection, and the Meanings of Illness. Oxford University Press.

Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and Markets in Higher Education: a “glonacal” analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 175. doi:10.2304/pfie.2004.2.2.2

Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x

Palmer, P. J. (2010). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life.

Pelias, R. J. (2004). A Methodology of the Heart. Rowman Altamira.

Ronai, C. R. (1998). Sketching With Derrida: An Ethnography of a Researcher/Erotic Dancer. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(3), 405–420. doi:10.1177/107780049800400306

Said, E. (2005). The public role of writers and intellectuals. Nation.

Said, E. W. (2012). Representations of the Intellectual. Random House LLC.

Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2010). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. JHU Press.

Smith, B. (1999). The Abyss: Exploring Depression Through a Narrative of the Self. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(2), 264–279. doi:10.1177/107780049900500206

Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732. doi:10.1177/107780040100700605

Wall, S. (2008). Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53.

 

Why bother with research engagement?

The Research Whisperer

Mark Hamann (James Cook University)After working for both NGOs and government, Mark Hamann is now a researcher and lecturer at James Cook University in Townsville.

His research interests cross several disciplines but generally relate to marine wildlife ecology, marine and freshwater turtle biology, marine wildlife management, conservation biology, and the impacts of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems.

Most of Mark’s current research projects are conducted with partners from government, industry, NGOs and Indigenous communities. He spends a considerable amount of his time talking about science and science delivery with his collaborators.

Last year, Mark participated in “I’m a Scientist get me out of here” and he was introduced to the world of online science communication. 

Mark tweets from @turtlesatJCU.


We already engage all the time. It’s a part of family life, work, and our everyday relationships.

Engagement describes a journey; it is about building a conversation, a friendship, trust and – ultimately –…

View original post 986 more words

How to calculate #MyGenderGap for publishing scientists

Good point on how we all can contribute to reproducing gender gaps:

The Lab and Field

A recent article in Nature looked at the gender gap in scientific publishing among a variety of countries.  There’s lots of good stuff in there, but the one metric I want to focus on is the ratio of women/men authors.  In Canada, it was 0.459, meaning that for every woman author, there are 2.17 male authors.

There’s lots out there on womein in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), the challenges they face, and the degree to which they are under-appreciated (including historical figures).

So what can I, a white man, do?

Well, the data in the Nature article had to come from somewhere.  So as an actively publishing scientist, I contribute to this phenomenon (regardless of whether my data were included in Nature).

After a bit of musing, I pulled up my current CV and decided to look at the gender gap in my own academic…

View original post 235 more words

MOOCs as a form of furtive learning

thelearningprofessor

For the last three weeks, I’ve been a student again. I’m following a MOOC offered by FutureLearn, an offshoot of the Open University in partnership with a number of other institutions. And I have to report that so far, I’m thoroughly enjoying the experience.

Most of the pleasure comes from following a subject in which I am interested, but I’m also deeply interested in how a MOOC actually feels on the receiving end. The flexibility is highly impressive: I can study a little segment as and when I have the time, and I can do it wherever I want. I am not going to list all the places where I have MOOCed, but suffice to say that they include the kitchen and my car – anywhere that involves waiting, or an activity that doesn’t involve my conscious brain. And it is reasonably sociable too; the discussion space is busy and…

View original post 430 more words

CfP: Troubling Narratives: Identity Matters

Shh! Thinking

I really liked this. We sometimes confuse the ‘massification’ of HE with the democratisation of learning. Some of the questions here suggest something else.

ag foghlaim

In the world of twitter, snapchat and even blogs, long-form journalism struggles to maintain its role in the exchange of ideas. As for traditional forms of academic discourse, even there we’re being persuaded to seek out the sound-bite, the idea in ‘a nutshell’ and told increasingly that our expectations of students to write academic essays and dissertations are ‘irrelevant’ for their futures, a future of work, that is.  Time is short, the competition for attention is fierce and contemplation is ‘idle’.

Just as modern medicine (or in truth, modern work expectations) has abolished recuperation (symptoms blocked? good, then back to work), all is a rush, time is short, there’s more to do. More incessant chatter in which to engage; always on lest we suffer from FOMO (fear of missing out).

And in learning too, the pace, deadlines ,rushing from lecture to lecture, taking test after test and no time to…

View original post 555 more words

Co-op or Co-opt?

Interesting thoughts on governance as the site of neo-liberal struggle

ag foghlaim

Governance. Obscure, arcane structures peppered with titles fully worthy of the faux-medievalism of many universities – that’s the view of many working in academia towards this issue. But, governance is precisely where the ideological battles around the role and future of higher education are being played out. Changes in the balance of representations from internal to external interests, from public service to business and ‘entrepreneurs’, from elected to appointed, from autonomous to ‘steered’, from values to products.

Management. Increasingly built on business models, the shift from President/Principa/Vice-Chancellor to CEO; after all aren’t universities multi-million Euro operations, don’t they need the discipline and efficiency of the private sector, or at the very least a form of ‘public accountability’ that isn’t reliant on academic values, personal integrity or something as unreliable as a sense of public service? So we’re told.

So what form then should a university take in terms of its…

View original post 370 more words

Ambition Drives Policy – Or When Policy is Morally Bankrupt

Recently I wrote about the pretence at rational planning that is the current state of Irish higher education reform.  The official policy discourse gives the impression that the flurry of activity that sees the presidents of Institutes of Technology meeting each other, the production of guidelines on criteria for Technological University status (that not quite a ‘real’ university status that IoTs may be granted) by Simon Marginson, and update reports by the Higher Education Authority are somehow the stuff of deliberative democracy.

My claim is that they are nothing of the sort. 

The reality is that as soon as the Hunt Report was published, with its well rehearsed arguments for institutional rationalisation (read budget cuts), Technological University status, and regional higher education clusters, ambitious presidents and registrars of IoTs quickly got into action.

Suddenly there were rumours of potential amalgamations between this IoT and another, of regional amalgamations.  Month by month it seemed these rumours changed, morphed.  What was a ‘definite’ love match one week was cast asunder the next.

It is important to note that all of this occurred in the absence of any real legislative framework.  Indeed, it still does.  It is an example of POLICY WITHOUT POLICY.  Instead, the process on the ground has been driven by ambition.  For all the attempt to put a rational gloss on things, the BIG players on the field call the shots their way.  For instance, the long held ambition for a ‘university of the South East’ (a dream thwarted by the OECD report) has framed the actions of at least one institution.  Others who may or may not come under the orbit of institutional merger in that region are bit players.  Hardly deliberative democracy.

Similarly, the changing elements of a possible regional fix in the North West has, it has been privately reported, been partly driven by a mixture of personal ambition and antipathy.

In a climate of fiscal restraint – OK, let me be blunt about this, in a climate of raiding the public sector purse to pay for the criminal mistakes of the private sector, the running around trying to either get in on a bigger players act, or desperately trying to secure some presence in the new future for non-university tertiary education, has involved massive transactional costs.  This is not just in the money (public money) spent on meetings, but the serious discontent amongst ordinary lecturers about their and their institution’s futures.  This sees itself in petty actions and in ill-health.  Ordinary lecturers are not participating in the discussions about their futures.  These are held by those higher up the institutional food chain.

This could have been different.  The HEA could have organised a more meaningful process.  The relevant government minister could have sought to legislate in a way that actually asked serious questions about what kind of higher education system a small open economy and country like Ireland could have.  But they didn’t.  I don’t know why.  Some might say it is the result of incompetence.  Some might say it was political ineptitude.  Some might say it was both.

What is clear, is that what is happening lacks any compassionIt is ethically moribund.  It is a moral embarrasment.

Helen Kara

Writing and research

(Ed) Tech on me

Mostly thoughts on ed tech related issues mixed with puns on occasions. Fr&Eng

Progressive Geographies

Thinking about place and power - a site written and curated by Stuart Elden

Social Abjection

new site now at: stigmamachine.com

catherinecronin

open educator | open researcher

The Ed Techie

on open education, digital scholarship & over-stretched metaphors

The Socialist Economic

Secular, Green, Feminist, Left-Wing

confessions of a worried teacher

critical inquiries into westernised higher education

Research Degree Insiders

Welcoming you in to the secrets, techniques and taboos around succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

.

the drop everything online journal.

Thesis Talk / Trácht ar Thráchtais

Tea biscuits and chat for PhDers / Deis chainte dóibh siúd atá i mbun thaighde iarchéime

patter

research education, academic writing, public engagement, funding, other eccentricities.

the (research) supervisor's friend

Just another WordPress.com site

The Research Whisperer

Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money

The Thesis Whisperer

Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages

thelearningprofessor

John Field's blog

ag foghlaim

learning, teaching, designing and hacking Irish higher education

%d bloggers like this: